A remark by Lova Ranoromaro, Director of International Relations and spokesperson for the Presidency of Madagascar, has ignited a wave of public debate, highlighting the tensions between citizens and the government.
The controversy erupted following her weekend interview on 24h Mada, in which she attempted to explain an academic exchange project with French institutions.
Her comment, “Ny profesora malagasy moa nanana ny maha izy tamin’izany fotoana izany, ary mampalahelo amin’ izao fotoana izao fa tsy misy intsony izany profesora tena hoe mahay, ary izay moa no tenenina hoe hanaovana izay exchange-na izay training,” was met with widespread criticism online.
Many academics felt belittled, prompting the Union of Teachers and Researchers (SECES) to demand a public apology, which Ranoromaro subsequently issued on Facebook. Despite this, some prominent figures, including the artist Rossy and FIVMPAMA president Rivo Rakotondrasanjy, urged the public to temper their reactions, framing the incident as a linguistic misstep rather than a deliberate slight.
Yet, for much of the public, the backlash reflects broader frustrations with the current administration. According to analysts, two key factors fuel the intensity of the response. First, an accumulation of political scandals and blunders—ranging from the Ambohimalaza and B777 affairs to controversial statements by other high-profile officials—has eroded trust in the government. “Since 2009, the Rajoelina clan has shown expertise in maintaining control despite public skepticism,” the report notes.
Second, citizens perceive increasing infringements on civil liberties, from electoral manipulation and restrictions on free speech to the use of force against peaceful demonstrations. These conditions, observers suggest, amplify public sensitivity, with minor verbal errors rapidly becoming symbols of governmental incompetence.
Ranoromaro’s case demonstrates how political missteps are magnified in an environment of distrust. Analysts argue that the government must address both the credibility of its officials and the broader climate of civic engagement. “Only what is respectable will be respected,” the commentary concludes, warning that without transparency and accountability, public dissatisfaction is likely to intensify.
The incident underscores the delicate balance between political communication, public perception, and governance in Madagascar, offering lessons on the consequences of mismanaged discourse in a highly polarized political environment.
About The Author
